Merger Structure Rundown: 338 Elections
As if the M&A world could not get any more complicated, I am going to blow your mind again. There are situations where an acquisition could be treated as both and Asset and a Stock purchase at the same time. I know, you are probably saying that this has to be a mistake that was missed on some 10,000+ page unrelated bill passed by Congress. However, it is not. Yes, the structure I am talking about is a 338 election.
Section 338 of the Internal Revenue Code allows for a corporate buyer and the selling entity to jointly elect to treat a stock purchase as an asset purchase for federal tax purposes (FYI, Section 336 is the applicable code provision for non-corporate buyers like LLCs). The selling entity is treated as selling its assets to the corporate buyer for the agreed upon stock purchase amount. In simpler terms, the Buyer gets a tax basis step-up advantage and the underlying selling entity remains in existence.
A regular 338 election is not typically used because there is a double taxation issue. The Seller would be taxed at the entity level for the gains on its asset sale and the seller’s shareholders would then be taxed on the sale of their equity. So, what do you do?
If you read Section 338 a little more (good cure for insomnia), you will see that there is a special 338(h)(10) election that can be made to alleviate this double taxation issue. Essentially, the stock sale is ignored for tax purposes if the requirements below are met:
- The Selling Company is an S Corporation; or
- The Buyer buys the stock of the Seller from one or more of the “corporate” shareholders of the Seller (i.e., you can’t buy stock from individual shareholders).
If your transaction looks like the above, then a 338(h)(10) might be right for you. However, keep in mind that the underlying entity remains along with its liabilities.
Your professional business advisors (accountants, attorneys, financial advisors, etc.) are the best place to go and discuss this structure.
Below are some good overviews of the different transaction structures (repeat from last week):
- M&A 101 – The difference between mergers and acquisitions
- Making Mergers, Acquisitions and Other Business Combinations Work
- Acquisition Structure – General Framework
Here are some other items of interest:
- White House Budget Proposal Includes Harmful Tax Increases (nfib.com)
- NFIB RESPONDS TO GOV. SHAPIRO’S BUDGET ADDRESS – NFIB
- The Silicon Valley Bank Collapse – Five Short–Term Recommendations (eisneramper.com)
- Silicon Valley Bank and the Strain on Startups | EisnerAmper
- Banking and the Economy – Silvercrest (silvercrestgroup.com) – thanks to Sean O’Dowd for sharing
- What Silicon Valley Bank’s Collapse Means for Your Money (advisor.news) – Thanks to Liberty Financial Strategies for sharing
- Six Principals of Accountability For Leaders – This is a great thought piece published in the CPBJ from Tim Strickler (Please check out his LinkedIn Profile; He is an excellent CFO);
- SALT: The Waterfall Effect of Hiring & Having Remote Employees (stambaughness.com) – 3/28 @ 2pm EST
- Smart Business Dealmakers Conference – April 26, 2023 (thanks to Murphy McCormack Capital Advisors for sharing)
Additional Merger Structure Rundowns
This blog post is part of a series on different types of merger structures. You can find the other structure rundowns at the links below:
- Merger Structure Rundown: Forward (Direct) Merger
- Merger Structure Rundown: Forward Triangular Merger
- Merger Structure Rundown: Reverse Triangular Strategy
As always, please don’t hesitate to email myself (email@example.com), Andy Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org), Christian Miller (email@example.com), Erik Spurlin (firstname.lastname@example.org), Brad Leber (email@example.com) or anyone in our office with questions or comments.
Please see all of our prior updates at this link or if you would like to be added to our email list, please click here.